Comments for Biblical Patriarchy http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com "Where there is no vision, the people perish..." Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:02:43 +0000 hourly 1 Comment on ‘True Woman’ movement seeks counter-revolution to feminism by Talitha Nun http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism/comment-page-1#comment-163 Talitha Nun Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:02:43 +0000 http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism#comment-163 Lol, yes, I guess I am just another one of these poor brainwarshed ones just because I happened to choose matrimony and motherhood over the pursuit of my personal (well-paying and highly esteemed - at least in the eyes of society) career... after all those years at university ! Well, every women capable of reading should know better than those two lady commentators, so... Good luck to you two, too. Lol, yes, I guess I am just another one of these poor brainwarshed ones just because I happened to choose matrimony and motherhood over the pursuit of my personal (well-paying and highly esteemed – at least in the eyes of society) career… after all those years at university ! Well, every women capable of reading should know better than those two lady commentators, so… Good luck to you two, too.

]]> Comment on ‘True Woman’ movement seeks counter-revolution to feminism by Joshuah http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism/comment-page-1#comment-162 Joshuah Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:17:13 +0000 http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism#comment-162 Thanks for your comment Adam. You are right of course, and feminism or women's lib as a socio-political construct is dangerous to us all. When I wrote the above statement, I was thinking more along individualistic lines rather than feminism as a movement, because I think that was the gist of the comments by Barb and Frau Doktor SMS. Ad hominem attacks. Notice what Barb says here: "Not every man is threatened by real women- they’re the ones enjoying our love and friendship without animosity." And dear SMS said: "I have found that men who are secure in themselves are not threatened by an intelligent, self assured, accomplished woman. " OK. They presuppose that someone promoting biblical patriarchy is motivated by insecurity, and feels threatened by and has corresponding animosity towards women who are strong, intelligent, and 'accomplished', whatever that means. Now, I promote a return to biblical patriarchy, and yet I don't fit with their presuppositions at all, but of course they wouldn't know this because they don't know me. People like Barb and SMS fashion 'true womanhood' according to their own image, or more correctly by the image that has been erected for them by the vile enemies of YHWH, and then claim that the men who find them desirable are the 'real' men, with the implication clearly being that men who don't find their particular brand of womanhood appealing to be suffering from some sort of pathology. Interesting mechanism of 'ego defense.' I wonder what they would make of my wife. They'd probably say she got brain-warshed. ;-) Thanks for your comment Adam. You are right of course, and feminism or women’s lib as a socio-political construct is dangerous to us all. When I wrote the above statement, I was thinking more along individualistic lines rather than feminism as a movement, because I think that was the gist of the comments by Barb and Frau Doktor SMS. Ad hominem attacks.

Notice what Barb says here: “Not every man is threatened by real women- they’re the ones enjoying our love and friendship without animosity.”

And dear SMS said: “I have found that men who are secure in themselves are not threatened by an intelligent, self assured, accomplished woman. ”

OK. They presuppose that someone promoting biblical patriarchy is motivated by insecurity, and feels threatened by and has corresponding animosity towards women who are strong, intelligent, and ‘accomplished’, whatever that means.

Now, I promote a return to biblical patriarchy, and yet I don’t fit with their presuppositions at all, but of course they wouldn’t know this because they don’t know me.

People like Barb and SMS fashion ‘true womanhood’ according to their own image, or more correctly by the image that has been erected for them by the vile enemies of YHWH, and then claim that the men who find them desirable are the ‘real’ men, with the implication clearly being that men who don’t find their particular brand of womanhood appealing to be suffering from some sort of pathology. Interesting mechanism of ‘ego defense.’ I wonder what they would make of my wife. They’d probably say she got brain-warshed. ;-)

]]> Comment on ‘True Woman’ movement seeks counter-revolution to feminism by Adam http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism/comment-page-1#comment-161 Adam Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:31:12 +0000 http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism#comment-161 Not to disagree with Joshua, because I am sure I don't, but, because I value my people and my God given place, I do see women's liberation, as a threat. Hence, I do see rebellious women, as threatening, to my people and myself. As, I think, any righteous and sane man would and any virtuous and sane women should. Not to disagree with Joshua, because I am sure I don’t, but, because I value my people and my God given place, I do see women’s liberation, as a threat. Hence, I do see rebellious women, as threatening, to my people and myself. As, I think, any righteous and sane man would and any virtuous and sane women should.

]]> Comment on Speaker Chastised Over Criticism of ‘Biblical Patriarchy’ at SBC Seminary by Joshuah http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/speaker-chastised-over-criticism-of-biblical-patriarchy-at-sbc-seminary/comment-page-1#comment-159 Joshuah Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:42:10 +0000 http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/speaker-chastised-over-criticism-of-biblical-patriarchy-at-sbc-seminary#comment-159 Thanks for sharing... Thanks for sharing…

]]> Comment on Speaker Chastised Over Criticism of ‘Biblical Patriarchy’ at SBC Seminary by smallshot http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/speaker-chastised-over-criticism-of-biblical-patriarchy-at-sbc-seminary/comment-page-1#comment-158 smallshot Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:42:31 +0000 http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/speaker-chastised-over-criticism-of-biblical-patriarchy-at-sbc-seminary#comment-158 I am grievously concerned about the twisting of basic sound doctrine. The words submit/submits/submitting are listed in the entire bible only 15 times. Submitted maid Hagar to Sarah: once Submit foreigners: twice Submitted to Solomon, the sons and mighty men of David: once Submit enemies: twice Submit to authority in ministry to those over you: once Submit wives to husbands: twice Submit to authority in government: once Submit to God: once Submit to elders: once Submit one to another as Saints: once Submit to the righteousness of God: once Submit with silver: once Yet entire movements have taken one portion of scripture and devised entire church movements, books media programs and a church focus on it. Which by the way negates the need for the cross or Christ himself; after all the emphasis is on the patriarch’s works and not Christ’s redemption. I believe a Christian man can be respected as an authority without having to stroke his ego into Lordship. Even Christ broke the patriarchal molds by speaking to, ministering to and defending women of fallen, unclean reputations and lifted them up in position above the patriarchal leaders of His days on earth. It is only right to obey scripture and submit to your husband. It is biblical not to permit a woman to have authority to rule over men in the church. With all of that said: It does not take a biblical scholar, but when one reads the entire chapter of Ephesians 5 can see there is a theme there. It starts off with gross sexual indulgences. Then the area goes further on to mindset: wife as unto Christ, husband as unto Christ and church. Lastly summed up in the final verse is: husbands love, wives respect. It doesn’t sum up husbands must ritualistically cleans wife anymore than Christ should have to ritualistically get back on the cross. It is a mindset of loving your wife and showering her in holy compliments, building her up through the Word of God and not to justify worldly ways. This area is not speaking of cramming a ritual down her throat to make her holy enough for heaven. A family enjoying the Lord through a family devotional time is wonderful and encouraged, but it shouldn’t end there. We should be lovingly respecting one another, exalting each other throughout the day into holiness. What are people thinking? Do you not know your shepherds voice yet? You continue to go back to circumcision and sacrifices (depending on works in the flesh)!! You know there is a most excellent way (1Corinthians 12:31-13)….. I am grievously concerned about the twisting of basic sound doctrine. The words submit/submits/submitting are listed in the entire bible only 15 times.
Submitted maid Hagar to Sarah: once
Submit foreigners: twice
Submitted to Solomon, the sons and mighty men of David: once
Submit enemies: twice
Submit to authority in ministry to those over you: once
Submit wives to husbands: twice
Submit to authority in government: once
Submit to God: once
Submit to elders: once
Submit one to another as Saints: once
Submit to the righteousness of God: once
Submit with silver: once

Yet entire movements have taken one portion of scripture and devised entire church movements, books media programs and a church focus on it. Which by the way negates the need for the cross or Christ himself; after all the emphasis is on the patriarch’s works and not Christ’s redemption. I believe a Christian man can be respected as an authority without having to stroke his ego into Lordship. Even Christ broke the patriarchal molds by speaking to, ministering to and defending women of fallen, unclean reputations and lifted them up in position above the patriarchal leaders of His days on earth.
It is only right to obey scripture and submit to your husband. It is biblical not to permit a woman to have authority to rule over men in the church. With all of that said: It does not take a biblical scholar, but when one reads the entire chapter of Ephesians 5 can see there is a theme there. It starts off with gross sexual indulgences. Then the area goes further on to mindset: wife as unto Christ, husband as unto Christ and church. Lastly summed up in the final verse is: husbands love, wives respect. It doesn’t sum up husbands must ritualistically cleans wife anymore than Christ should have to ritualistically get back on the cross. It is a mindset of loving your wife and showering her in holy compliments, building her up through the Word of God and not to justify worldly ways. This area is not speaking of cramming a ritual down her throat to make her holy enough for heaven.
A family enjoying the Lord through a family devotional time is wonderful and encouraged, but it shouldn’t end there. We should be lovingly respecting one another, exalting each other throughout the day into holiness. What are people thinking? Do you not know your shepherds voice yet? You continue to go back to circumcision and sacrifices (depending on works in the flesh)!! You know there is a most excellent way (1Corinthians 12:31-13)…..

]]> Comment on ‘True Woman’ movement seeks counter-revolution to feminism by Joshuah http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism/comment-page-1#comment-157 Joshuah Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:19:49 +0000 http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism#comment-157 Thanks for sharing that... Thanks for sharing that…

]]> Comment on ‘True Woman’ movement seeks counter-revolution to feminism by SMS http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism/comment-page-1#comment-143 SMS Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:52:19 +0000 http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism#comment-143 I am a born again, married female physician who is married to another MD. I have found that men who are secure in themselves are not threatened by an intelligent, self assured, accomplished woman. Most men married to foreign mail order brides ended up divorced within 5 yrs. Good luck to you. I am a born again, married female physician who is married to another MD. I have found that men who are secure in themselves are not threatened by an intelligent, self assured, accomplished woman. Most men married to foreign mail order brides ended up divorced within 5 yrs. Good luck to you.

]]> Comment on Evolution is being distorted by pollution, which damages genitals and the ability to father offspring, says new study. by Joshuah http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/evolution-is-being-distorted-by-pollution-which-damages-genitals-and-the-ability-to-father-offspring-says-new-study/comment-page-1#comment-125 Joshuah Thu, 28 May 2009 20:54:37 +0000 http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/evolution-is-being-distorted-by-pollution-which-damages-genitals-and-the-ability-to-father-offspring-says-new-study#comment-125 Quick_reply="no" Quick_reply=”no”

]]> Comment on Evolution is being distorted by pollution, which damages genitals and the ability to father offspring, says new study. by Heidi http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/evolution-is-being-distorted-by-pollution-which-damages-genitals-and-the-ability-to-father-offspring-says-new-study/comment-page-1#comment-124 Heidi Thu, 28 May 2009 07:52:12 +0000 http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/evolution-is-being-distorted-by-pollution-which-damages-genitals-and-the-ability-to-father-offspring-says-new-study#comment-124 Maybe the Goddess is sending a message that She is angry over how the male gender has taken care of Her planet! Time for a return to Matriarchy. Maybe the Goddess is sending a message that She is angry over how the male gender has taken care of Her planet! Time for a return to Matriarchy.

]]> Comment on ‘True Woman’ movement seeks counter-revolution to feminism by Joshuah http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism/comment-page-1#comment-88 Joshuah Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:58:25 +0000 http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism#comment-88 Hi Barb, and thanks for your comment. Unfortunately, you seem to be confusing evolution with progress. They are not synonymous. To be sure, an evolutionary process has been taking place for quite some time now, one that has worked hard to facilitate both the tendency and ability of fine young women to become wastrels of their true God given potential, and engage in the lifelong pursuit of empty, fruitless, self-centered indulgences and fornication's. Contrary to your implication, I do not find someone of this particular variety to be a true picture of a "real" woman. Indeed, this is not anyone to be threatened by at all. Regardless, it is our intention, God willing, to see this ungodly process come to an end very soon, one way or the other. Hi Barb, and thanks for your comment. Unfortunately, you seem to be confusing evolution with progress. They are not synonymous. To be sure, an evolutionary process has been taking place for quite some time now, one that has worked hard to facilitate both the tendency and ability of fine young women to become wastrels of their true God given potential, and engage in the lifelong pursuit of empty, fruitless, self-centered indulgences and fornication’s. Contrary to your implication, I do not find someone of this particular variety to be a true picture of a “real” woman. Indeed, this is not anyone to be threatened by at all. Regardless, it is our intention, God willing, to see this ungodly process come to an end very soon, one way or the other.

]]> Comment on ‘True Woman’ movement seeks counter-revolution to feminism by Barb Garner http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism/comment-page-1#comment-87 Barb Garner Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:54:08 +0000 http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism#comment-87 I've been enjoying a childfree life, busy career, and loads of cats, chocolates, friends, art, church, martinis, and dozens of other blessings for a long time now, without exhausting my womb to a loveless marriage. Get out of the dark ages and allow society to evolve to its potential. Not every man is threatened by real women- they're the ones enjoying our love and friendship without animosity. I’ve been enjoying a childfree life, busy career, and loads of cats, chocolates, friends, art, church, martinis, and dozens of other blessings for a long time now, without exhausting my womb to a loveless marriage. Get out of the dark ages and allow society to evolve to its potential. Not every man is threatened by real women- they’re the ones enjoying our love and friendship without animosity.

]]> Comment on ‘True Woman’ movement seeks counter-revolution to feminism by Glenn http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism/comment-page-1#comment-40 Glenn Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:55:05 +0000 http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/true-woman-movement-seeks-counter-revolution-to-feminism#comment-40 So after 50 million abortions, 40 odd years of kicking men in the teeth at every given opportunity, and the wholesale obliteration of anything remotely resembling a family...the American female wants to sue for peace? I cant help but wonder if the imploding economy and the lowest marriage rates in recorded history have something to do with this sudden urge for reconciliation. All well and good, of course, but there is a little something American females forgot to take into account. The growing (skyrocketing?) trend of American men getting married to foreign ladies. Myself included, of course. I wont deny that this is a step in the right direct, but I think the only way to restore faith is 40 years of respect for men and boys. But that will only begin to restore some faith. Till then, I will forbid my future sons to marry an American female, and urge my future daughters to value men or look forward to a future filled with chocolate and cats! So after 50 million abortions, 40 odd years of kicking men in the teeth at every given opportunity, and the wholesale obliteration of anything remotely resembling a family…the American female wants to sue for peace? I cant help but wonder if the imploding economy and the lowest marriage rates in recorded history have something to do with this sudden urge for reconciliation. All well and good, of course, but there is a little something American females forgot to take into account. The growing (skyrocketing?) trend of American men getting married to foreign ladies. Myself included, of course. I wont deny that this is a step in the right direct, but I think the only way to restore faith is 40 years of respect for men and boys. But that will only begin to restore some faith. Till then, I will forbid my future sons to marry an American female, and urge my future daughters to value men or look forward to a future filled with chocolate and cats!

]]> Comment on About Biblical Patriarchy by Joshuah http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/about-biblical-patriarchy/comment-page-1#comment-39 Joshuah Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:51:16 +0000 #comment-39 Wow Clarence, you almost had me convinced, so powerful was your argument. You should consider a run for Parliament. Your little diddy about "live your own life the way you see fit" has been said many times before, more eloquently perhaps by those like Aleister Crowley, who said "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law." We know where that leads. And, if I were to take your advice to heart and live my own life the way I see fit, people like you would end up being the first to molest me and my attempts to live my life the way I see fit it by making comments like "So Gay. All of you are ridiculous." This makes you a hypocrite, doesn't it? Clarence prompts me to create a rule for this site. To make a comment you must first have something of substance to contribute, pro or con. It must have a certain degree of intelligence behind it, otherwise it ends up trapped in the twit filter. Wow Clarence, you almost had me convinced, so powerful was your argument. You should consider a run for Parliament. Your little diddy about “live your own life the way you see fit” has been said many times before, more eloquently perhaps by those like Aleister Crowley, who said “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.” We know where that leads. And, if I were to take your advice to heart and live my own life the way I see fit, people like you would end up being the first to molest me and my attempts to live my life the way I see fit it by making comments like “So Gay. All of you are ridiculous.” This makes you a hypocrite, doesn’t it?

Clarence prompts me to create a rule for this site. To make a comment you must first have something of substance to contribute, pro or con. It must have a certain degree of intelligence behind it, otherwise it ends up trapped in the twit filter.

]]> Comment on About Biblical Patriarchy by Clarence http://www.biblical-patriarchy.com/about-biblical-patriarchy/comment-page-1#comment-38 Clarence Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:30:27 +0000 #comment-38 So gay. All of you are ridiculous. Come to the present, and forget a book written by man. Do not fool yourselves in to thinking God wrote that crap. Embrace change, think independently, live your own life the way you see fit and not what some ancient old men thought a life was supposed to be. So gay. All of you are ridiculous. Come to the present, and forget a book written by man. Do not fool yourselves in to thinking God wrote that crap. Embrace change, think independently, live your own life the way you see fit and not what some ancient old men thought a life was supposed to be.

]]>